Comments on: ComicCon Miscellany http://www.petervbrett.com/2009/02/20/comiccon-miscellany/ Journal of Peter V Brett Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:37:30 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jeff C http://www.petervbrett.com/2009/02/20/comiccon-miscellany/comment-page-1/#comment-3882 Jeff C Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:33:53 +0000 http://www.petervbrett.com/?p=1038#comment-3882 I agree with your comments on reviewers including plot summaries in their reviews. I almost always avoid them, instead I tell readers if they want a plot summary, check out Amazon or the author (or publisher's) website. I think reviewers should tell readers what they liked and didnt like about the EXECUTION of the story. I agree with your comments on reviewers including plot summaries in their reviews. I almost always avoid them, instead I tell readers if they want a plot summary, check out Amazon or the author (or publisher’s) website. I think reviewers should tell readers what they liked and didnt like about the EXECUTION of the story.

]]> By: edifanob http://www.petervbrett.com/2009/02/20/comiccon-miscellany/comment-page-1/#comment-3881 edifanob Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:20:22 +0000 http://www.petervbrett.com/?p=1038#comment-3881 The review on The Old Bat's Belfry has been written by Mulluane. She is one of my favorite reviewer. I appreciate her work and trust her discernment. Anyway I look forward to read THE WARDED MAN aka THE PAINTED MAN. The review on The Old Bat’s Belfry has been written by Mulluane. She is one of my favorite reviewer. I appreciate her work and trust her discernment.

Anyway I look forward to read THE WARDED MAN aka THE PAINTED MAN.

]]>